The People You
Thought You Knew – Jacob
Genesis
32:22-32[1]
22That night
Jacob got up and took his two wives, his two maidservants and his eleven
sons and crossed the ford of the Jabbok. 23After he had sent
them across the stream, he sent over all his possessions. 24So
Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak. 25When
the man saw that he could not overpower him, he touched the socket of
Jacob’s hip so that his hip was wrenched as he wrestled with the man.
26Then the man said, “Let me go, for it is daybreak.” But
Jacob replied, “I will not let you go unless you bless me.” 27The
man asked him, “What is your name?” “Jacob,” he answered. 28Then
the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but
Background[2]
Genesis
(Hebrew:
בראשית,
Greek: Γένεσις, meaning "birth", "creation", "cause", "beginning",
"source" or "origin") is the first book of the Torah, the Tanakh, and
the Old Testament. In Hebrew, it is called בראשית
(B'reshit
or Bərêšîth),
after the first word of the text in Hebrew (meaning
"in the beginning").
This is in line with the pattern of naming the other four books of the
Pentateuch. As Jewish tradition considers it to have been written by
Moses, it is sometimes also called The
First Book of Moses.
Genesis contains the historical presupposition
and basis of the national religious ideas and institutions of
Biblical Truths and Theology[3]
Jacob separated himself from his flocks and family and remained on
the far side of the Jabbok river. Should Jacob's behavior be construed
as an act of cowardice, or did he just need time to contemplate his
future? This may have been part of a scheme to distance himself from
Esau, using his dependents and estate as buffers. Perhaps he sought
again to call on God for help (see 32:9-12). It may have been both. In
any case, the aloneness of Jacob here at Penuel matches his aloneness at
Instead of being alone, Jacob found himself
wrestling with "a man."
The
assailant is called a man, but as the story develops it becomes clear
that it is Elohim (A name for God in
the Hebrew Scriptures. [Hebrew ’ĕlōhîm , pl. of ’ĕlōah , God.])
Himself. Jacob, whose name means "heel-grabber," hence "trickster,"
undergoes a name change to
Penuel (with an alternate
spelling Peniel)
literally means "face of God," because there Jacob saw God directly. A
recurring theme in the Elohist is that one cannot look at God and live
(see also Moses at the burning bush in Exodus 3). This reinforces the
utter powerfulness of Elohim. Yet Jacob saw the face of God and lived--a
sign that indeed he was blessed.
The final note in verse 32 is introduced by
"Therefore to this day," indicating that this version of the story was
written down later than the event itself, namely, when Israelites were
around. Apparently this story, however old the core of it may have been,
was appropriated at a later time and was used to explain the Jewish
avoidance of eating the thigh muscle, identified in Jewish tradition
with the sciatic nerve.
The meaning of the story is elusive. Yet at the very
least it serves to characterize Jacob as persistent, even relentless, in
his pursuit for blessing. Taken together with the other Jacob stories,
this story says Jacob would stop at nothing to secure a personal
advantage. Jacob never waited for his destiny. He made it happen.
Single-mindedly and often deviously he pursued the divine blessing.
Divine destiny and human response are united in one action sequence in
the Jacob cycle.
Items for
Discussion
-
How is Jacob’s wrestling match like spiritual warfare today?
-
Do you think that Jacob actually won against God? (see verse 28)
-
If there is spiritual warfare and real
warfare, how is each won?
In other words, what would the
effective strategies look like?
-
What did Jacob recognize that resulted in his victory?
-
What is the lesson for us in that same struggle?
2 Corinthians 5:16-18
16So from
now on we regard no one from a worldly point of view. Though we once
regarded Christ in this way, we do so no longer. 17Therefore,
if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new
has come! 18All this is from God, who reconciled us to
himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: …
Background[4]
While
there is little doubt among scholars that Paul is the author, there is
discussion over whether the letter was originally one letter or a
combination of two or more of Paul's letters. Although the New Testament
only contains two letters to the Corinthians, the evidence from the
letters themselves is that he may have written at least four:
-
1 Cor 5:9 ("I
have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral
people", NIV) refers to an early
letter, sometimes called the "warning letter".
-
1 Corinthians
-
Paul refers to an earlier "letter of tears" in 2 Corinthians
2:3-4 and 7:8. 1 Corinthians does not match that description; so
this "letter of tears" might be between 1 Corinthians and 2
Corinthians.
-
2 Corinthians
Most of
this discussion is centered around the abrupt change of tone from being
previously harmonious to bitterly reproachful in 2 Corinthians 10-13
leading many to speculate that chapters 10-13 form part of the "letter
of tears" which were in some way tagged on to Paul's main letter. For
the purpose of this study, we will assume only two letters and not
address this controversy.
Biblical Truths and Theology[5]
Know no man after the flesh ...
The new manner of life for Christians follows the principle laid down
here. "They no longer measure men by human standards of race, natural
gifts, social standing, or possessions." No sooner had Paul written this
than he remembered how, before his conversion, he had measured the
Christ himself by those very standards. This he at once confessed and
repudiated.
Even though we have known Christ after the
flesh ...
Regarding the meaning that Paul, as a disciple of Gamaliel, might have
had some association with Jesus during his ministry; although this was
by no means impossible, it is clear that Paul's meaning here is that:
Prior to his conversion, his knowledge of Christ had been after the
flesh, formed in accordance with external and mistaken standards; but
his conversion had meant the transformation of his knowledge of Christ.
Yet now we know him so no more ...
Paul no longer judged Christ after the false and artificial standards of
the Pharisaical class to which he had once belonged.
Verse 17
In Christ ...
Paul used this expression, or its equivalent, 169 times!
Paul
had just written that all people are dead spiritually, a deadness that
shall never abate unless they are risen again IN CHRIST. In Christ, a
new spiritual life is given to the convert; in Christ all of his
previous sins are cancelled; in Christ he is endowed with the Holy
Spirit; in Christ a new and glorious life begins; in Christ old values
are rejected, old standards repudiated, and old lusts are crucified; in
Christ are "all spiritual blessings" (Ephesians 1:3); out of Christ,
there is nothing but death, remorse, hopelessness and condemnation; in
Christ there is the life eternal!
Verse 18
All things are of God ...
The marvelous blessings "in Christ" are of God, as Paul would explain a
moment later, because God was in Christ, Christ being called GOD no less
than ten times in the Greek New Testament. It was the Second Person of
the Godhead, however, who entered earth life as a man, bore the sins of
the whole world and offered himself upon
Who reconciled us ...
People are the ones who need to be reconciled; and this thought is again
implied here.
And gave unto us ...
This is a reference to the apostles of Christ, to whom was committed the
ministry of reconciliation, meaning the glad news of the redemption
available to every man "in Christ." In a far lesser sense, every
Christian is also a custodian of the good news; but in the original and
plenary sense, this applies only to the apostles of Christ.
Items for
Discussion
-
How has
accepting Christ made you different?
-
Why do you
think that your faith in someone whom you have never physically met
can influence your life the way it does?
-
What is
the best part about the “Good News” that you like to share?
-
How do you
interpret the use of the word, reconciliation?
Discussion
Challenge
-
What good
news does our church share without the use of words?
