Sweet
Chariots of Fire!
II
Kings 2:1-12[1]
1When the LORD was about to take Elijah up to
heaven in a whirlwind, Elijah and Elisha were on their way from Gilgal.
2Elijah said to Elisha, “Stay here; the LORD has sent me to
Bethel.” But Elisha said, “As surely as the LORD lives and as you live,
I will not leave you.” So they went down to Bethel. 3The
company of the prophets at Bethel came out to Elisha and asked, “Do you
know that the LORD is going to take your master from you today?” “Yes, I
know,” Elisha replied, “but do not speak of it.” 4Then Elijah
said to him, “Stay here, Elisha; the LORD has sent me to Jericho.” And
he replied, “As surely as the LORD lives and as you live, I will not
leave you.” So they went to Jericho. 5The company of the
prophets at Jericho went up to Elisha and asked him, “Do you know that
the LORD is going to take your master from you today?” “Yes, I know,” he
replied, “but do not speak of it.” 6Then Elijah said to him,
“Stay here; the LORD has sent me to the Jordan.” And he replied, “As
surely as the LORD lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So the
two of them walked on. 7Fifty men of the company of the
prophets went and stood at a distance, facing the place where Elijah and
Elisha had stopped at the Jordan. 8Elijah took his cloak,
rolled it up and struck the water with it. The water divided to the
right and to the left, and the two of them crossed over on dry ground.
9When they had crossed, Elijah said to Elisha, “Tell me, what
can I do for you before I am taken from you?” “Let me inherit a double
portion of your spirit,” Elisha replied. 10“You have asked a
difficult thing,” Elijah said, “yet if you see me when I am taken from
you, it will be yours—otherwise not.” 11As they were walking
along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of
fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to
heaven in a whirlwind. 12Elisha saw this and cried out, “My
father! My father! The chariots and horsemen of Israel!” And Elisha saw
him no more. Then he took hold of his own clothes and tore them apart.
Background[2]
Often called the
Deuteronomic History of the Kings of Israel and Judah because of the
prominence attached to the Deuteronomic law of the Central Sanctuary,
Kings discusses the attitudes of Israel’s kings toward the observance of
the law of the Central Sanctuary as the most important factor in their
various reigns. In this respect, the kings’ conduct determined more than
anything else whether they did that which was evil or that which was
good in the sight of Yahweh. Although some of the kings ruled for a
comparatively long time and others occupied the throne for only a brief
period, all were judged by the same standards. Any king who failed to
destroy the high places of worship or permitted the people to offer
sacrifices at any place other than the Temple in Jerusalem was said to
have performed evil in the sight of Yahweh and was responsible for the
disasters that fell upon the nation.
Biblical Truths and Theology[3]
During the reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah the courts and local
sanctuaries were frequented by groups of prophets (the word used is
nabi’,
pronounced naa-vee).
Not all of these were prophets of Yahweh. In the story of Elijah we are
told that Jezebel, Queen of Israel, had about 450 prophets of Baal and
400 prophets of Asherah at court. Many of the prophets of Yahweh had
been murdered by Jezebel, although some had been saved (1 Kgs 18:3-4).
It was the task of prophets to advise kings and
others what action or policy to adopt. Kings and other officials needed
to be aware of what the gods planned or were up to. One could not afford
to be at odds with divine plans. From the story of Elijah, and that of
Micaiah in 1 Kings 22, we see that prophets had a very important
religious and political role. The risks of bad advice to a king were
high. As with political advisers today, the possibilities of overly
strong influence on the king on the one hand or a weak ‘yes-man’
capitulation on the other were also high. It is little wonder that laws
and traditions developed in Israel and Judah dealing with the notion of
a true prophet (see Deut. 13:1-5; 18:15-22 and 1 Kings 13).
Elisha seems to have gathered a
group of disciples around himself who had possibly belonged to cultic
sites like Bethel or Gilgal. Early stories of such prophets note their
sometimes ecstatic behaviour, believed to be caused by the
ruach or ‘spirit of
the Lord’ (e.g. 1 Samuel 10) coming upon them. On the other hand, Elijah
was an independent figure. He is called ‘man of God’, as distinct from ‘nabi’’,
and leads a wandering existence, appearing when Yahweh directs him to
confront one or other of the kings. Unlike Elisha, he does not seem to
be attached to any sanctuary, court, or group, although he could have
been the spiritual master of a guild of nabi’s (cf. 1 Sam.
19:18).
As today’s passage begins
Elijah is nearing the end of his life and is engaged in what appears to
be a farewell tour of the sanctuaries of Gilgal, Bethel and Jericho.
With him is his heir apparent, Elisha, who seems keen to inherit the
prophetic mantle of Elijah, and his personal calling by Elijah seems to
have been settled (see 1 Kgs 19:19-21). The nabi’s at each
sanctuary come out and tell Elisha what he already knows; Elijah is soon
to be taken away by Yahweh. Elisha silences them, a motif which reminds
us of the ‘messianic secret’ in Mark (e.g. Mark 9:9 etc.). Perhaps
Elisha is pictured as resisting the inevitable, or perhaps it is a
literary device to maintain the mystery of the event. Nevertheless,
fifty of the nabi’s accompany Elijah and Elisha to the Jordan
river, where Elijah demonstrates his status as a ‘second Moses’ by
parting the waters. Even the course of Elijah’s journey – Gilgal,
Jericho, Jordan – echoes the journey of the people after entering the
promised land and hence portrays Elijah as somehow following on from
Moses.
Elisha’s request that he
inherit a double portion of Elijah’s prophetic power (2 Kgs 2:9) echoes
the double portion of the first-born. Elisha will succeed Elijah. The
fact that his request would be granted only if he has a vision of
Elijah’s translation signifies the mystery of the transmission of these
spiritual gifts and that they are indeed divine
gifts. Elisha
receives the gifts, along with the prophetic mantle. He and Elijah are
separated by a chariot and horses of fire representing the presence of
Yahweh even as Elijah is taken up to heaven in a whirlwind. The fire and
the whirlwind and Elisha’s later visit to Mt Carmel recall Elijah’s
earlier deeds, especially the calling down of divine fire on Mount
Carmel (1 Kings 18:20-35), and the solitary mountain-top experience (1
Kgs 19:1-15a). Elisha inherits the authority of Elijah, but only at the
behest of Yahweh. This is reinforced later in the chapter, beyond
today’s reading, by Elisha’s following in Elijah’s footsteps and parting
the Jordan with Elijah’s mantle (2 Kgs 2:13-14), by the testimony of the
nabi’s that “The spirit of Elijah rests on Elisha” (v. 15), by
the miracle Elisha now performs (vv. 19-22), and finally in the gruesome
tale of the bears and the boys (vv. 23-24).
Items for
Discussion
-
Would you
want to know exactly when and how you would be taken to heaven?
-
What are
the frightening parts about knowing and what are the comforting
parts?
-
Elisha’s request for a double portion of
prophetic power sounds like an arrogant request.
When it comes to gifts from God, what
can we discern from this story?
-
What
symbolism do you see in the use of a chariot for Elijah?
-
How would
you tell this story today using modern symbolism?
-
What is
the symbolism connected with the parting of the waters?
-
Why is
symbolism important to understand our God?
Mark 9:2-9
2After six days Jesus took Peter, James and John
with him and led them up a high mountain, where they were all alone.
There he was transfigured before them. 3His clothes became
dazzling white, whiter than anyone in the world could bleach them.
4And there appeared before them Elijah and Moses, who were talking
with Jesus. 5Peter said to Jesus, “Rabbi, it is good for us
to be here. Let us put up three shelters—one for you, one for Moses and
one for Elijah.” 6(He did not know what to say, they were so
frightened.) 7Then a cloud appeared and enveloped them, and a
voice came from the cloud: “This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to him!”
8Suddenly, when they looked around, they no longer saw anyone
with them except Jesus. 9As they were coming down the
mountain, Jesus gave them orders not to tell anyone what they had seen
until the Son of Man had risen from the dead. 10They kept the
matter to themselves, discussing what “rising from the dead” meant.
Background[4]
The Gospel of Mark is one of four gospels in the
Holy Bible and is the second book in
chronological order presented in the New Testament. Mark (John Mark was
his full name) was an associate with Simon Peter, one of the 12 apostles
that followed
Jesus Christ throughout His public
ministry on earth. Peter was the name given to Simon by Jesus Christ
personally (Mark 3:16). He was very close to Jesus and after the
crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus, Peter was one of the
founders of the early
Christian church. Although the book
was written by Mark, the facts contained in it are thought to be the
accounts of Peter during his ministry with Jesus. The consensus among
scholars is that the book of Mark was written between 50 and 60 A.D. The
author is referenced several times in the New Testament starting in the
book of Acts, chapters 12 and 13, in Colossians 4:10, and finally in 2
Timothy 4:11. The book of Mark was probably written in Italy, and
perhaps even Rome. This book has 16 chapters and is the shortest book of
the four gospels. However, the details of the events and miracles of
Jesus in this book are consistent with the other three gospels;
Matthew, Luke and John.
Biblical Truths and Theology[5]
This passage has been chosen to accompany Mark’s account of the
transfiguration (Mark 9:2-9). The stories have many features in common,
especially the recall of Moses and Elijah, the mysterious translation of
the central character in the presence of his disciple(s), and the
‘passing’ of a ‘mantle’ to the disciple(s). Both stories speak of the
divine authority vested in the central character. This is a turning
point in the Gospel as we pass from a predominant focus on miracle
stories, which in their own way point to who Jesus is, to his journey to
the cross. In the transfiguration God himself clearly attests to Jesus’
true identity. This reinforces the great confession of Peter that Jesus
is the messiah (Mark 8:29). Both stories also speak of the transmission
of authority to (a) disciple(s). In 2 Kings 2 prophetic authority has
clearly moved to Elisha. In Mark, Jesus has just begun to teach his
disciples what their calling really means (Mark 8:34-9:1). It is news
which by themselves they cannot bear, as Peter’s refusal (Mark 8:32) and
the disciples’ later confession that they could not help the possessed
boy (Mark 9:28) make clear.
Finally, while both stories have a sense of mystery about them and
convey a sense of mystery in the matters of prophetic authority and
Jesus’ mission, they are not stories concerned only with ‘other worldly’
things. In the stories of Elijah and Elisha there is a strong political
theme where Yahweh’s prophet is embroiled in the political and religious
issue of the day. Likewise with Jesus, he comes down from the mountain
of mystery only to be run down (literally) by a crowd concerned about
what to do (if they can) for a boy horribly ‘possessed’ of some malady.
Divine authority, in prophet, or disciple as in Jesus, is not something
blissfully removed from the struggles and maladies of this world.
Rather, it is both the thing that gives one strength and confidence in
the face of such matters, and the thing which reveals their true nature.
Items for
Discussion
-
How is the
idea of symbolism used by Mark?
-
What are
some of the symbols used and how to they relate to who Christ is?
-
Why is
transfiguration important to the Christian faith?
-
The stories told in these verses are filled
with political and religious crisis.
How are these stories relevant to us
today?
Discussion
Challenge
-
In what
way can a congregation reassure the faithful that God is completely
in charge?
[1] Translations: New International Version (NIV)
